Yes on Measure B for a Permanent Marin Farmer’s Market

On the ballot June 3, 2014, is Measure B, which will help the Marin Farmers Market take root in a permanent home at the Marin Civic Center – at no cost to the public. In 1992, Marin voters passed a measure requiring a vote of the people for any changes to the Marin Civic Center site. Yes on B will give permission to the Agricultural Institute of Marin (AIM), the non-profit that runs the Civic Center Farmer’s Market, to negotiate with Marin County to create the permanent home.

The permanent home for the Marin Farmers Market – “The Farmers Market Canopy and Market Hall” – will be a community hub for agriculture and will benefit our West Marin farmers and ranchers as well as the community at large. “The farmers market project is an essential contributor to the future success of agriculture here in Marin as well as our entire Bay Area food shed”, states Julie Rossotti of Rossotti Ranch. “It will provide a permanent place for farmers and ranchers to sell our locally grown food directly to our community, for decades to come. To have a permanent “home” to sell our meat gives me inspiration and encouragement to continue my family’s tradition of ranching in Marin County.”

For more than three decades, the Marin Farmers Market, operated by AIM, has provided a direct market for local farmers, jobs for hundreds of people and a place for thousands of Marin residents to shop for local farm fresh goods – helping launch the farm to table movement. Each Sunday and Thursday, this town square at the Marin Civic Center brings together more than 200 farmers, specialty food purveyors, artisans and thousands of patrons to celebrate a vibrant local food movement.

For the past 31 years, the Marin Farmers Market has operated on parking lot tarmacs, moving around according to available space and lacking consistent electricity for refrigeration, access to running water, and always vulnerable to weather. AIM, with its dedication to sustainable food production and consumption, understands that this transient lifestyle is no longer sufficient. “The Marin Farmers Market is ready for a permanent home,” states Brigitte Moran, AIM’s CEO. “Measure B will allow the Marin Farmers Market to continue as an invaluable resource and gathering place for future generations – a landmark dedicated to local food, farming, and families in Marin…forever”. AIM and the County of Marin have worked in close conjunction to determine the optimal site, with design concepts from architect Buddy Williams, and a business model that supports both social and economic benefits. The project’s main features will include:

– The Market Canopy: The expanded Farmers Market will operate two days per week, with a possible third day added later, much of it under the shelter of a light-permeable cover that will provide for year-round access.

– Education and event facilities: The project will allow AIM to offer new and expanded programs – convening of national and international seminars with local agricultural leaders, facilitating donations from farmers to local food pantries, expanded WIC and food stamp programs, cooking classes, cultural events and an array of educational opportunities such as AIM’s highly popular Diggin’ the Market program for local schoolchildren.

– The Market Hall & Plaza: Central to the new facility will be its retail center where locally grown food, including cheese, meats and artisan-prepared foods, can be purchased seven days a week, directly from local producers. Day tables will allow farmers to sell local produce on off-market days.

– Eco-friendly design. The entire project celebrates natural resources, minimizes energy utilization, uses recycled materials, collects rainwater and is part of the bicycle and pedestrian master plan. AIM is both committed to providing the community with healthy food and to being a responsible steward of our environment. One June 3 Marin voters will have the opportunity to help make this a reality with the next step in the Marin Farmers Market’s journey. The Farmers Market is a treasured resource in Marin. With more than $15 million in goods sold each year, the Farmers Market is an engine of the local economy that supports our farmers and provides our community with fresh, local food.

Yes on B will help the Marin Farmers Market take root at the Civic Center.

Nancy Scolari Recognized by Marin Resource Conservation District

Marin Conservation League President Jon Elam with Nancy Scolari, Executive Director of the Marin Resource Conservation District, at the Conservation League’s annual dinner last month. Scolari received the John M. McPhail, Jr. Green Business Award. The Conservation League recognized her work with the Marin RCD for bringing together diverse stakeholders to design and implement numerous conservation projects on Marin County ranches, including improvements to water quality, habitat enhancement, carbon sequestration, and pasture health.

This year the Marin RCD, based in Pt. Reyes Station, is managing conservation projects with budgets totaling $740,000 on seven local farms and ranches, all with the cooperation and assistance of partnering agencies and the farmers and ranchers.

Herd Out West

Couldn’t help but hear.
“And don’t eat the lettuce . . . .it’s a prop!”
Melissa Claire, director of Kids Musical Theater, to young actors before the opening night performance of “We Are Monsters.” Heard at the Dance Palace by Ramon Cadiz of Inverness.

Citizen readers:When you hear or observe something amusing in West Marin, over the hill, while on vacation or a business trip or perusing blogs, we want to join in the fun. E-mail submissions to Or telephone: 415-454-3552

Elk putting National Seashore ranches at risk-Part 2

As reported in the Citizen last week, the Point Reyes Seashore Ranchers Association (PRSRA) has stepped up pressure on park officials to take immediate action to remedy overgrazing and other elk problems they claim threatens the very survival of the ranches in Point Reyes National Seashore (PRNS). This week, PRNS officials respond to that article, plus answer additional questions on the issue.

As background, tule elk, native to California, had all but disappeared from the Point Reyes area by 1860. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), in cooperation with US Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Park Service (NPS), reintroduced tule elk to the 2,600 acre Tomales Point Wilderness in 1978. They are kept from roaming into the ranch areas, restricted by the Pacific Ocean to the north and west, Tomales Bay to the east, and a three-mile-long, ten-foot-high wildlife fence to the south.

In 1998, NPS officials moved 45 elk from that original herd to the Limantour Estero Wilderness area to “establish a free-roaming herd”. No fences were built to contain this new herd, although a formal Elk Management Plan was developed.

In 1999, two elk from this herd “showed up behind the barns on the C Ranch”, across Drakes Estero some six to eight miles away, “with tracking collars on their neck” according to C Ranch manager Ernie Spaletta. The NPS says they did not relocate this herd, rather they migrated out of the unfenced, free-roaming wilderness area on their own.

It is this third herd that is causing consternation among the ranchers in the Drakes Beach area of PRNS. Now 74 animals strong, according to the last official NPS count, they are now roaming around the B, C, and E ranch pastures in the Pastoral Zone with the cows.

Asking for help

Ranchers, in their September 23, 2013 letter to NPS Superintendent Cicely Muldoon, assert “The Drakes Beach herd is affecting ranchers in this area on a daily basis by damaging fences and other infrastructure allowing cattle to get into the wrong pastures, impacting forage and water resources, causing physical harm to livestock, and putting the ranchers’ organic certifications and overall livelihoods at serious risk. Despite the Seashore’s promises of commitment continually made to the PRNS ranching community that their sustainability is ensured, the current problems created by the elk guarantee an end to agriculture in the park.”

In that letter, the PRSRA quotes a March 2012 letter from Marin County Supervisor Steve Kinsey: “Their concern, and mine is the considerable damage and economic impact that grazing elk are having on their operations. Additionally the elk population is growing by 12% each year and migrating further onto agricultural leased property.”

David Press, NPS Wildlife Biologist for PRNS, and NPS Outreach Coordinator Melanie Gunn discussed rancher concerns, the 1998 Elk Management Plan, and other tule elk herd management issues during a recent Citizen interview at Park Headquarters.

Press stressed the 1998 Elk Management Plan specifically addressed the “reintroduction of a free-range herd in Limantour, but it did not anticipate the elk wandering into the Pastoral Zone, and the plan does not address what the park should do in that situation. It only addresses what the park should do if elk migrate outside the park.”

New plan needed

Press said while ranchers have asked the NPS to move the elk back to the wilderness area, the PRNS Elk Management Plan does not allow for that, according to Department of Interior (DOI) attorneys. “So we need to develop a new Elk Management Plan to address the movement of elk from wilderness to pastoral ranching areas inside the park itself,” he said.

“PRNS wants to strengthen relationships with the ranchers,” Press continued. “We are not phasing out ag for tule elk or other wildlife. We are committed to preserving ag and finding the right balance with wildlife management.”

Gunn added emphasis to Press’ comments saying “NPS officials truly want to work closely with the ranchers to solve the problem, and continue to build on the historical NPS support of ranching in the park.” She said they are guided by a letter written by former DOI Secretary Ken Salazar in May 2012 to Senator Diane Feinstein, in response to the Senator’s request on behalf of the PRSRA that he review the NPS efforts to address the elk situation to “protect the rights and property of ranching leases.”

Gunn said the NPS continues today to follow Salazar’s lead in the agency’s commitment to the ranching community as stated in his response to Feinstein: “The NPS actively supports historic dairy and beef operations at Point Reyes and has made significant investments in ranching infrastructure. PRNS recognizes that beef and dairy ranches operate in a challenging economic environment and we take the concerns raised by the park ranchers seriously. The 1998 Tule Elk Management Plan and Environmental Assessment for Point Reyes did not contemplate, analyze, or assess the establishment of a tule elk herd in the pastoral ranching zone of the Park,” his letter continued.

Two interpretations

The PRSRA has stated that 1) the ranchers simply want the NPS to follow the existing 1998 NPS Elk Management Plan that provides for relocating elk that cause damage to private property; and 2) the association disagrees with the NPS contention that the 1998 management plan does not apply to this herd of elk and that NPS hands are tied until a new Environmental Assessment (EA) which would contain a new Elk Management Plan must be completed before anything can be done.

Press, however, said the NPS interprets the plan differently. “The 1998 EA allowed for reintroduction of tule elk into a new area as a free range herd (the Limantour Wilderness herd noted above). It did not anticipate that the tule elk would wander or migrate into the Pastoral Zone, and so the 1998 plan does not address what the park should do in that situation. It talks quite specifically, I think, about what the NPS must do if the tule elk leave the park and enter private property—not if they end up in areas of the park where they were not expected to roam.”

Ranchers point to several statements within the 1998 EA they believe gives the NPS authority to act, including “Under alternative A the Seashore will maintain the elk fence on Tomales Point and continue to separate elk from cattle.” They also point to the section of the EA titled “Relocation of Elk to Limantour” which states “Tule elk will be allowed to roam outside the area as long as new home ranges are not established where conflicts with traffic corridors or neighbors are likely.”

“We too are concerned about elk impacts on ranching operations,” Press emphasized. “The statement that the park has not been doing anything to help the ranchers is just not accurate. We are preparing for the planning process, by meeting with ranchers and we have more field biologists spending time in the Pastoral Zone monitoring elk. The ranchers are saying we want you to move the elk back to the wilderness area, and it is their opinion that the 1998 Elk Management Plan allows for that.” However, Press pointed out “We contend that we cannot, because of our solicitors and DOI lawyers guidance that says ‘no the 1998 Elk Management Plan does not give you that authority.”

A new plan

Gunn interjected, “In fact, it would be going against NEPA law if we did that. As much as we would like to help solve the problem now, we don’t have the authority.” (As required by federal law and NPS management policies, management plans must be developed through a public process that conforms to the National Environmental Quality Act (NEPA). The NEPA process consists of an evaluation of the environmental effects of a federal undertaking including its alternatives.)

She said she was “Happy to announce today that we have finally secured the funding to do a new comprehensive dairy and ranching management plan which is also needed because of Secretary Salazar’s decision last November to extend the ranches’ special use permits to 20 years. The tule elk will be addressed in the new plan that covers the new lease terms.” (Special use permits are often referred to as “leases” that govern the ranching operations. In this instance, the NPS is the landlord and the ranchers are the tenant operators. Originally written for five years, and then extended to 10 years, the permits were issued to the original owners of ranches whose land was condemned by the government and then leased back to the original owners when PRNS was designated national park.)

Gunn and Press were then asked “How do you respond to people who say the elk should not have been reintroduced into the pastoral zone from the wilderness because doing so is a violation of California Coastal Act because the elk are displacing ag land and that is violation of the California Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) that says “federal agencies shall comply with the CZMA o the extent possible under federal law and that enforceable policies of the CZMA provide that lands suitable for agriculture shall not be converted to nonagricultural use unless continued or renewed agricultural use is not feasible?”

“The NPS is staying in ag, we support ag in the PRNS,” Gunn responded. “We are grateful we now have funding to begin the new 20-year planning process we’ve been talking about, that is going to get underway after the first of the year, that will focus on the future of ag in the park. And, actually some ranchers are not sure they want 20 year leases, so it could be for a period of up to 20 years.”

Not ‘if’ but ‘how’

She pointed out “There has been some talk about Drakes Bay Oyster Company leaving the park as the first sign that ranches will be pushed out of the park, and that is absolutely not true.” She continued, “The Secretary has confirmed that with his announcement of 20-year leases. This planning process is not about whether the ranches will stay in PRNS, but how they will stay. PRNS is a model for the country when it comes to ranches inside parks. This is a real opportunity to change the tone in the community about ranches and the park. We are looking forward to how we can strengthen relationships with ranchers in the park.”

Press added, “As another example of the fact we are not phasing out ag for tule elk or other wildlife in the park, I want to point out that when D Ranch closed during 2001, and reverted to park management, the main pastures remained in ag; they were divided up between the C Ranch and the E Ranch. We are committed to preserving ag in the park.”

The D Ranch reverted to NPS when Horick family heirs decided to exit the ranching business after their mother Vivian died. Most of the pasture area of the ranch was added to adjacent ranch leases: pasture acres were added to the adjacent Historic C Ranch lease, managed by Ernie and Nichola Spaletta, and to the Historic E Ranch managed by Tim Nunes. Press noted that the D Ranch farmstead buildings (house, barns, sheds), livestock watering ponds, and the land that runs down to Drakes Beach reverted to PRNS management, and is no longer permitted for grazing.”

Press and Gunn were also asked to respond to another prickly question: “What do you say to the ranchers who remind me that when they went back to Washington, D.C., they ‘agreed to lay down their swords and stop fighting condemnation of their land for the establishment of the new PRNS if the government would allow them to run the ranches as they always had done’—and there were NO elk involved when they made that agreement, and no EIS was done in advance of reintroducing elk onto their ranches?”

“It’s true, no EIS was done,” Press said, continuing “There is no current document around elk, and that’s an issue for us out there, too. Again, no one anticipated the elk would migrate out into the ranches.”

Elk movement tracked

One of the biggest challenges associated with managing elk, of course, is their impact on available forage for both wildlife and livestock, Gunn noted. A full time NPS range management specialist is assigned to work with the Seashore ranchers “as it is complicated to run a ranch on NPS property given NEPA rules.”

Press has employed the use of sophisticated GPS tracking devices to monitor where the elk are roaming. Two cows and two bulls were outfitted with tracking collars in the Drakes Bay area in October 2012 with three-hour data points. The computerized system generates an email to Press every three days, from which he can create a map of where the elk have been. That data, along with visual observations by biologists who are in that area two or three times per week, will be included in the preparation of the elk management plan component of the new 20-year management plan for the Pastoral Zone. Gunn said “We are generating valuable research data. Thus far, we have 650 surveys of elk movement completed since the fall of 2009.”

Getting back to the specific requests of the ranchers who have reported damages that are affecting their economic well being, Press noted two key complaints: damages to fences and forage consumption by elk. (The operating leases require ranchers to pay for the cost of fencing, building maintenance such as new roofs, ranch roadway maintenance, and general upkeep of the entire infrastructure on the properties.)

“We are exploring opportunities to provide additional pastures to affected ranchers, from areas now controlled by the park that are not part of the ranch leases, forage areas that are adjacent to affected ranches.” Gunn noted.

‘Elk crossing’

Press said they are working on fence damage concerns. NPS has installed “elk crossings” that allow elk to move across fence lines without tearing up the fences, as shown in the attached photo provided by the NPS. Press noted that they want to help with fence repair, and “some ranchers request we don’t repair their fences, and some do.”

Press also noted that in an attempt to alleviate pressure on ranch forage and water resources—especially in this recent drought year when many livestock watering ponds dried up—and to keep elk bunched up away from ranch pastures, PRNS has started an elk watering project at the D Ranch.

Two, 5,000 gallon water tanks have been set up outside the old barn on D Ranch and tapped into the Drakes Beach Visitor Center water system. Water is pumped up to the holding tanks so it can be “de-chlorinated” before it is piped out to two old livestock watering ponds and one spring area below the barns, keeping them full. “This project is designed to encourage the elk to stay on the NPS property at the D Ranch, instead of roaming onto leased pastures,” Press said.

According to Press, 60 cow elk are congregating around the D Ranch watering areas, and GPS monitoring shows a significant reduction in the use of neighboring ranch pastures, even though no supplemental feeding is provided.

Population control options are controversial to say the least, but the ramifications of doing nothing can have far reaching impacts on wildlife habitat as well as agricultural operations. According to CDFW reports, at the Tupman Tule Elk Reserve, where no cattle compete with the elk for forage, the elk were confined to a 953-acre enclosure, and no mechanisms for population control were used. As a result, the herd expanded to a point where the habitat was essentially destroyed and artificial feeding was necessary.

Hunting option

The hunting option to control population numbers has been controversial at all national parks. While most NPS policies do not allow hunting of native wildlife in official “national parks”, The Wildlife Society’s 2012 technical report titled “Ungulate Management in the National Parks of the US and Canada” notes the enabling legislation for the NPS authorizes hunting in some types of park units, such as national seashores and national preserves.

Press noted “hunting will not likely be an option for PRNS given the history of West Marin community advocates who are against all hunting. Controlled reduction of herd size will be addressed in our new management plan. We don’t have answers to that now, that is another reason why we need a new Elk Management Plan,” he concluded.

Currently there are 21 herds of tule elk in California, with numbers estimated at about 3,800 animals. PRNS is home to 708 animals or 19 percent of the state’s tule elk population, according to CDFW.

Interestingly, herd management plans for all of the other tule elk relocation areas in California include hunting. But they are managed by CDFW, with decidedly different policy mandates than the NPS. Last year, 12,537 applications were received for 125 hunting permits. The highest demand for permits was for hunting at Grizzly Island, where over 2500 hunters applied for two permits.

Ranchers are not pushing for a park hunt. They want all the elk in the Pastoral Zone to be relocated to either the existing fenced Tomales Point Wilderness herd, or they suggest the NPS could build a new fenced area that would prohibit movement onto Pastoral Zone pastures.

And, they want action now. As one rancher noted, “We don’t have the luxury of waiting another two years for another management plan—a plan we don’t think we need because NPS already has an elk management plan. The feed costs we are incurring now because elk eat the pasture our cows used to eat are going to run us out of business. We don’t have the option of cutting herd size to accommodate elk, we must maintain an economically viable cow herd size. The elk herd has been growing at 12 percent per year since we first asked the NPS to get the elk out in 2000. You figure those 70 or so elk out there right now are eating about what 70 cows would eat. We are in the Pastoral Zone, and no elk should be in that zone according to our original deal with the Government.”

by Ann Miller. Published December 2013

The importance of play

Living and working on a farm these past ten years, I have become increasingly convinced that we modern humans have much to learn from the animals around us – both wild and domesticated. One of the unavoidable lessons of farm life is that young animals play. While our mature cows tend to focus on activities like eating, protecting their young, and grooming, calves spend their time frolicking, chasing one another, and generally testing things out. While the casual observer might consider their activities trivial, by observing them over time one can easily see how play helps prepare animals for later life.
With human children, the importance of play has sometimes been underestimated. Many classrooms for young children have tended to emphasize academic preparation, especially as we’ve entered the computer age. “All too many of us believe even young children should be working, learning to read, and doing arithmetic, and perhaps a few beginning computer skills,” notes Dr. David Elkind, professor emeritus of Child Development at Tufts University. Elkind believes that a young child’s most important learning comes instead from “self-created experiences.”
Dr. Alison Gopnik, a psychologist at University of California, Berkeley, has spent years researching how play affects learning. She compares children at play to “pint-sized scientists testing theories,” and says the best stimulation for learning is to let preschoolers pretend, explore, and play.

Nationally recognized Marin County-based child psychologist Dr. Madeleine Levine would likely agree. Levine has written extensively about the problems she encounters in teenage patients who have been pushed too hard and too early. Asked recently how a parent should best discover a child’s interests and abilities, Levine answered:  “Let them play. That’s where they learn about sharing, problem solving, getting along with others, and being creative.”
The play-based learning philosophy is warmly embraced by Bolinas’s preschool. Laura Di Stasi, the Bolinas Children’s Center’s head teacher, describes the school’s approach as “loosely based” on Reggio Emilia ideas, which originated in post-World War II Italy. Rather than being the targets of instruction, children are considered to have a very active role in their learning.
Important parts of the approach include exposing the children to nature, extended outside playtime, and allowing children to follow their own instincts. Di Stasi, who has been involved in preschool education for over three decades, says that it’s important for teachers to provide materials and an environment for learning, then “step back and let the children take it from there.” Such an approach is sometimes difficult for adults but Di Stasi believes it is the best way to teach children how to take personal responsibility for the choices they make.

She feels that the Bolinas preschool’s space is especially well suited for the school’s play-based philosophy. “Movement is so important. Some schools are deliberately set up to restrict it. But I want them to feel they have the freedom to move – both indoors and, especially, outdoors.” The school’s indoor area has a large, open middle space, surrounded by a half-dozen areas, each dedicated to specific activities. There’s an area for puzzles, one for drawing and writing, an area for dramatic play, blocks, one for drawing, writing and other crafts, and another area for truck, trains and cars. A large easel is continually set up, allowing three children to paint alongside one another. Outside, the school has a large grassy yard, sand box, climbing structure, swing-set, vegetable garden, and a track for tricycles and other vehicles. A significant part of every day, except those with very inclement weather, is spent outdoors.

Recently, the school set up its science discovery table with plastic insects. Some children took the bugs outside, giving them histories and adventures. “It has been fascinating to watch them create insect families and story lines,” Di Stasi reports.

Ultimately, Bolinas Children’s Center director Ward Young and teacher Di Stasi believe they are providing children an environment that will not only engage and entertain the children, it will prepare them well for life. “Although it is counter-intuitive, the more children learn from their own play when they are young, the better prepared they are to learn from academic instruction when they are older,” Dr. Elkind has concluded.

Visitor's Guide to Coastal Marin and the Sonoma Coast